Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Risk perception versus risk analysis
pp. 1-4(4)
Authors: Okrent D.; Pidgeon N.

Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research
pp. 5-15(11)
Author: Pidgeon N.

Risk perception and risk management: on knowledge, resource allocation and equity
pp. 17-25(9)
Author: Okrent D.

Facts and values in risk assessment
pp. 27-40(14)
Author: Cross F.B.

Technological stigmatism, risk perception, and truth
pp. 41-45(5)
Author: Garrick B.J.

Diagnosing stigma
pp. 47-48(2)
Author: Fischhoff B.

The role of risk perception for risk management
pp. 49-62(14)
Author: Renn O.

Communicate unto others...
pp. 63-72(10)
Author: Fischhoff B.

The risk game
pp. 73-77(5)
Author: Slovic P.

Meaning and contextualisation in risk assessment
pp. 79-89(11)
Author: Horlick-Jones T.

The political science of risk perception
pp. 91-99(9)
Author: Jasanoff S.

Public perception versus results of scientific risk analysis
pp. 101-105(5)
Author: Cohen B.L.

The role of risk perception and technical information in scientific debates over nuclear waste storage
pp. 107-122(16)
Authors: Jenkins-Smith H.C.; Silva C.L.

Nuclear waste management: shifting the paradigm
pp. 123-128(6)
Author: North D.W.

Ten propositions for untangling descriptive and prescriptive lessons in risk perception findings
pp. 129-134(6)
Author: McDaniels T.L.

Risk perception, safety goals and regulatory decision-making
pp. 135-139(5)
Author: Hoegberg L.

Acceptable risk as a basis for design
pp. 141-150(10)
Authors: Vrijling J.K.; van Hengel W.; Houben R.J.

Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk-based decision making
pp. 151-159(9)
Authors: Bohnenblust H.; Slovic P.