Genetically Modified Food: Ethical Implications along the Food Chain
Author: Gottwald, Franz-Theo
Source: Democracy, Ecological Integrity and International Law, Issue data not provided , pp. 287-305(19)
Abstract:By manipulating the genetic make-up of plants and animals, gene material from one organism is artificially inserted into another species. This is supposed to give genetically modified (GM) organisms new capabilities.
There are many promises, the gentech-industry made during the last decades. However, none of the supposed pioneering scientific findings really turned out to be transferable to reality. First of all, the industry promised to produce genetically modified (GM) seeds which would result in better crop quality, higher resistance against certain pests and diseases and higher yields. Hence, the farmers would benefit from GM seeds, requiring fewer pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, resulting in better economic income. As a positive side-effect, the environment would benefit from less use of harmful chemical substances in agricultural production.
Reality has shown that the opposite has come true. After decades of research there are no GM food crops that live up to all this hype. In the United States, farmers have been sueing producers of GM seeds for poor harvests for years (Bové and Dufour 2001, p 145). Newspapers and NGOs consistently report about Indian farmers who have committed suicide; the poor quality of GM cotton and new, so far unknown pests, in combination with debts due to overpriced seeds take away their means of existence. Farmers who were supposed to reap the benefits of GM technology instead run the risk of facing financial ruin.
GM plants have shown to be very susceptible, and prone to various other diseases and pests. One example for the misleading promises of the industry is MON810 maize, patented by the controversial American Monsanto company. This maize is genetically engineered to produce a modified insecticide (Cry1Ab) that naturally occurs in the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The production of this toxin is supposed to protect maize plants from European corn borer larvae (ECB, Ostrinia nubilalis). However, the maize made headlines due to poor performances, concealed facts about potential health risks and doubtful usefulness.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 1 January 2010
- Democracy, Ecological Integrity and International Law
Democracy, Ecological Integrity and International Law is the latest product of research by the Global Ecological Integrity Group (www.globalecointegrity.net), an organisation that has been meeting annually since 1992 to discuss scientific, philosophical, political and legal aspects of ecological integrity. This collection examines various aspects of governance from the standpoint of integrity: from democracy, to forms of Native governance, from globalization and neocolonialism to specific human rights to food, water and climate.
- Submit a Paper
- Purchase hard copy print edition
- Learn more about CSP @ GSE Research
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites