Activity Pacing in Chronic Pain Management: One Aim, but Which Method? Part Two: National Activity Pacing Survey

Authors: Birkholtz, Marietta; Aylwin, Louise; Harman, Rachel Megan

Source: The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Volume 67, Number 11, November 2004 , pp. 481-487(7)

Publisher: College of Occupational Therapists

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $19.76 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Part one of this paper suggested that, in order to attain activity goals, it is important to replace activity contingent on pain with activity contingent on quota, such as time or number. This is one aspect of activity pacing, which can help to break the detrimental overactivity-underactivity cycle. However, there are few established guidelines regarding activity pacing. Part two reports a study which sought to answer two questions: what are the main principles underlying activity pacing and how are activity pacing principles taught?

A questionnaire was posted to all 78 members of the National Occupational Therapy Pain Association in order to sample current practice. The 49 (63%) respondents endorsed nine behaviours contributing to activity pacing, including planning activities, breaking activities into manageable parts, increasing activity amounts gradually and alternating tasks. The occupational therapists used varied methods to teach these behaviours and only half of them used time as the unit of increase. These therapists disagreed about how long to continue timer use for and what activities to use it for.

The importance of time-contingency in activity pacing, and related teaching methods, is contentious. No alternatives were suggested to time-contingency to break the pattern of pain-contingency in activities. Studies are urgently needed concerning the efficacy of time-contingency, the efficacy of any alternatives and their acceptability to patients.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: November 1, 2004

More about this publication?
  • The British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles relevant to theory, practice, research, education and management in occupational therapy internationally.

    BJOT publishes research articles, critical reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews and an annual index. Please refer to the author's guide at http://www.cot.co.uk/british-journal-bjot/british-journal-occupational-therapy

    Submissions can be made at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/bjot

    The 2012 Impact Factor for The British Journal of Occupational Therapy is 1.096.

  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page