If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Peer and Organizational Review in the Post Vannevar Bush Era

$25.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

This commentary concentrates on research and development (R&D) enterprises, with a focus on peer review, primarily as used in manuscript review. This commentary also examines the technology transformation process and how peer review and organizational review serve each other, quite effectively. The key arguments made are that (1) peer review is not without its own problems; (2) it should be understood that peer review is focused largely on the most basic of scientific endeavors (i.e., discovery and not technology development), and (3) technical reporting (i.e., scientific or engineering writing in which there is organizational/vertical review) plays the major role in the actual transformation of ideas into wealth.

Document Type: Commentary

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/107292408786938763

Publication date: December 1, 2008

More about this publication?
  • The journal Technology is a forum for presentation of information encompassing essentially the entire field of applied sciences. Owing to the broad nature of applied sciences, authors should be guided by the interest of the readers who are likely to be knowledgeable non-specialists.
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more