Skip to main content

Free Content Do self‐assessments of health predict future mortality in rural South Africa? The case of KwaZulu‐Natal in the era of antiretroviral treatment

Download Article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingenta Connect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Abstract:

Abstract

Objectives  While self‐assessments of health (SAH) are widely employed in epidemiological studies, most of the evidence on the power of SAH to predict future mortality originates in the developed world. With the HIV pandemic affecting largely prime age individuals, the strong association between SAH and mortality derived from previous work might not be relevant for the younger at‐risk groups in countries with high HIV prevalence in the era of antiretroviral treatment. We investigate the power of SAH to predict mortality in a community with high HIV prevalence and antiretroviral treatment (ART) coverage using linked data from three sources: a longitudinal demographic surveillance, one of Africa’s largest, longitudinal, population‐based HIV surveillances, and a decentralised rural HIV treatment and care programme.

Methods  We used a Cox proportional hazards specification to examine whether SAH significantly predicts mortality hazard in a sample composed of 9217 adults aged 15–54, who were followed up for mortality for 8 years.

Results  Self‐assessments of health strongly predicted mortality (within 4 years of follow‐up), with a clear gradient of the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs), relative to the baseline of ‘excellent’ self‐assessed health status and controlling for age, gender, marital status, the socio‐economic status (SES), variables education, employment, household expenditures and household assets, and HIV status and ART uptake: 1.40 (95% CI 0.99–1.96) for ‘very good’ self‐assessed health status (SAHS); 2.10 (95% CI 1.52–2.90) for ‘good’ SAHS; 3.12 (95% CI 2.18–4.45) for ‘fair’ SAHS; and 4.64 (95% CI 2.93–7.35) for ‘poor’ SAHS. While a similar association remained in the unadjusted analysis of long‐term mortality (within 4–8 years of follow‐up) the hazard ratios capturing SAH are jointly insignificant in predicting of mortality once HIV status, ART uptake and gender, age, marital status and SES were controlled for. HIV status and ART programme participation were large and highly significant predictors of long‐term mortality.

Conclusions  Our findings validate SAH as a variable that significantly predicts short‐term mortality in a community in sub‐Saharan Africa with high HIV prevalence, morbidity and mortality. When predicting long‐term mortality, however, it is much more important to know a person's HIV status and ART programme participation than SAH.

Language: English

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03012.x

Affiliations:  Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA, USA

Publication date: 2012-07-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more