Skip to main content

Free Content Simultaneous administration of praziquantel, ivermectin and albendazole, in a community in rural northern Ghana endemic for schistosomiasis, onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis

Download Article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingenta Connect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library


Objectives  To compare (i) side effects associated with the simultaneous adminstration of praziquantel, albendazole and ivermectin with side affects associated with albendazole and ivermectin only and (ii) coverage by volunteers distributing three or two drugs.

Methods  Two‐arm comparative study in northern Ghana integrated praziquantel distribution into an existing lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis control programme using Community Directed Distributors. The control arm continued to distribute only ivermectin and albendazole. Dosages of ivermectin and praziquantel were based on height. Treatment was directly observed, and all two/three drugs were co‐administered. Adverse effects were recorded based on passive surveillance. Parasitological, anthropometric and haematological data were collected at baseline.

Results  Prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium infection among 1001 (boys: 47.9% girls: 52.1%) school‐age children (6–15 years) [intervention: 30.0% (CI: 23.1–34.2); control: 23.0% (CI: 18.9–27.0)], mean haemoglobin, weight and age were similar among the intervention and control groups. While 1676 (99.1%) compounds in the control area were visited and 15 020 (96.58%) people were treated, only 1375 (88.5%) compounds in the intervention area were visited and 8454 (80.97%) people treated (P < 0.001). The numbers of adverse effects were similar (intervention: 50/6896; control: 130/15 020). The most reported adverse effects was headache (intervention: 14/50; control: 13/130), followed by body weakness, which was reported more from the intervention group (intervention: 13/50, 95% CI: 14.6–40.3; control: 6/130, 95% CI: 1.7–9.8]. Sixty‐six per cent (6896/10 441) of the eligible population received praziquantel.

Conclusions  Reported adverse events were mild and managed at the subdistrict level with no cases of hospitalization; intensive health education will, however, be required to improve coverage.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Language: English

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1:  Navrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana 2:  Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 3:  Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana

Publication date: 2011-09-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more