Polymerase chain reaction in comparison with serological tests for early diagnosis of human leptospirosis
The aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using two primer pairs and combined with blood culture, immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM ELISA), microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and slide agglutination test (SAT) in the diagnosis of human leptospirosis. We analysed 124 serum samples: 60 from patients with confirmed leptospirosis, 20 from patients with other diseases and 44 from healthy individuals. Analysing the first serum sample collected during the first 3–8 days of disease, the sensitivities of the four tests MAT, IgM ELISA, SAT and PCR were, respectively, 69.0%, 79.3%, 72.4% and 62%. In subsequent samples, those same sensitivities were, respectively, 95.4%, 100%, 100% and 72.7% in samples collected from days 9 to 14 and 88.9%, 88.9%, 77.8% and 44.4% in those collected from days 15 to 42. The most specific method (at 100%) was PCR and the least specific (at 89.1%) was IgM ELISA. Although we found PCR to be less sensitive than the serological tests over the course of the disease, our data indicate that PCR was the most sensitive in those initial serum samples presenting no specific antibodies detectable by any of the serological methods tested. We also recommend that PCR can be used in combination with serological tests as we found that this improves the sensitivity of the diagnosis of leptospirosis in the first phase of the disease (93.1–96.5%).
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Laboratory of Medical Investigation in Immunology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil 2: Department of Medical Biology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil 3: Department of Serology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil 4: Laboratory of Soroepidemiology and Immunobiology, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 5: Emilio Ribas Institute of Infectology, São Paulo, Brazil
Publication date: 2006-11-01