Skip to main content

Free Content Choosing between public and private or between hospital and primary care: responsiveness, patient-centredness and prescribing patterns in outpatient consultations in Bangkok

Download Article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingenta Connect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Abstract:

Summary Objective 

To document differences in provider behaviour between private and public providers in hospital outpatient departments, health centres and clinics in Bangkok, Thailand. Method 

Analysis of the characteristics of 211 taped consultations with simulated patients. Results 

Private hospitals and clinics were significantly more responsive. Private clinics but not private hospitals were also significantly more patient-centred. All doctors, but particularly those in private hospitals, prescribed unnecessary and potentially harmful technical investigations and drugs. The direct cost to the patient varied between 1.5 (in public health centres) and 12 (in private hospitals) times the minimum daily wage. The combined cost – to the patient and to the state – in public hospitals and health centres exceeded the cost of consultations in private clinics. Conclusion 

Market incentives favour responsiveness and a patient-centred approach, but not more appropriate therapeutic decisions. Excessive use of pharmaceuticals is observed among public as well as private providers, but is most pronounced in private hospitals. If patients in Bangkok want to maximize responsiveness and degree of patient-centred care and yet minimize costs and iatrogenesis, they would benefit from avoiding hospitals, both public and private, and, to a lesser extent, specialists. Choosing to use primary facilities, health centres and clinics, particularly when consultations are carried out by general practitioners (GPs), is more beneficial than choosing between public and private providers.

Keywords: consumer protection; cost; medicalization; outpatient care; patient-centred care; prescribing; public–private; responsiveness; simulated patients

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01532.x

Affiliations: 1: National Health Security Office, Nonthaburi, Thailand 2: World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Publication date: 2006-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more