Skip to main content

Free Content Efficacy of combination therapy with artesunate plus amodiaquine compared to monotherapy with chloroquine, amodiaquine or sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum in Afghanistan

Download Article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingenta Connect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Summary Introduction 

In South and Central Asia resistance to chloroquine (CQ) has reached unmanageable levels, and resistance to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP) is emerging. Amodiaquine (AQ) is widely used in the region, and elsewhere shows only partial resistance to CQ. In Afghanistan, one option for slowing the spread of resistance and improving treatment outcomes is the use of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). Methods 

The efficacy of CQ, AQ, SP and amodiaquine plus artesunate (AQ/AS) in the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria was investigated using standard World Health Organization (WHO) procedures. Malaria patients were randomized to four treatment groups: 268 were enrolled and 240 completed the trial. Results 

There was a high level of cross-resistance between CQ and AQ resistance: adequate clinical and parasitological response by day 42 was 11% after CQ treatment and 9% after AQ treatment. The trend of treatment failure between AQ and CQ was almost identical. Cure rates were considerably improved by the addition of artesunate to AQ or by use of SP; adequate clinical and parasitological response being 72% for AQ/AS and 92% for SP. The combination of AS/AQ substantially reduced the odds of treatment failure relative to AQ monotherapy by day 42 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.1] in addition to reducing the proportion of patients with gametocytes throughout the 42-day period. Gametocyte carriage rate was only marginally higher in the SP than in the CQ- and AQ-treated groups. Conclusion 

The therapeutic and parasitological cure rates with AS/AQ were inadequate, and the criteria for deploying ACT – namely to prevent further selection of drug resistance from a position of low frequency – was not met in the region. An alternative drug combination to AQ/AS is required for Afghanistan.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: ACT; Afghanistan; amodiaquine; combination therapy; malaria

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: HealthNet International, Malaria and Leishmaniasis Control Programme, University Town, Peshawar, Pakistan 2: Disease Control and Vector Biology Unit, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Publication date: 2005-06-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more