Skip to main content

Free Content Open randomized study of pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine vs. pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine plus probenecid for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children

Download Article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingenta Connect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Summary Background 

Increasing drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum has necessitated renewed search for cheap, effective alternatives to commonly available antimalarials, chloroquine and pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine, for the treatment of malaria in Africa. Probenecid, an inhibitor of organic anion transporters and multiresistance-associated proteins, can chemosensitize P. falciparum to pyrimethamine and sulphadoxine in vitro, but the clinical significance is unclear. We assessed the safety, treatment efficacy, and effects on gametocyte carriage of adding probenecid to pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine. Methods 

We evaluated 151 children aged 12 years or younger who had uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. Patients were randomly assigned pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine (25 mg/kg of the sulphadoxine component) or pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine as above plus probenecid 20–25 mg/kg of bodyweight in two divided doses daily for 3 days. The primary endpoints were parasitological cure rates on days 14 and 28. Results 

Both regimens were well tolerated; no child was withdrawn because of drug intolerance. Fever (1.9 ± 1.1 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2 days, P = 0.02) and parasite clearance (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1 days, P = 0.04) were significantly shorter, and the parasitological cure rate on day 14 (96.2%vs. 83.5%, P = 0.02) but not day 28 (79.4%vs. 72.6%, P = 0.4), was significantly higher in children treated with pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine–probenecid than in those treated with pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine. Gametocyte carriage was similar with both treatment regimens. Conclusions 

The combination of pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine, and probenecid, at a relatively moderate dose, improved treatment efficacy but had no effect on gametocyte carriage. The pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine–probenecid combination merits further evaluation as a potential treatment for use in Nigeria.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Nigeria; children; malaria; probenecid; pyrimethamine–sulphadoxine

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2004-05-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more