If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Free Content Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasal swab specimens for detection of respiratory syncytial virus in different settings in a developing country

You have access to the full text article on a website external to ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Download Article:


OBJECTIVE To compare detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) for diagnostic purposes using nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) and nasal swabs (NS) in different clinical settings in a community study in Guinea-Bissau.

METHOD During 1996–98 paired specimens were obtained from 635 children under 5 years of age (median: 274 days; interquartile range: 144–453 days) with symptoms of lower respiratory infections (LRI). The specimens were analysed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for RSV antigen in Guinea-Bissau and re-analysed in Denmark using the same assay. The gold standard for RSV antigen detection was defined as any test being positive.

RESULTS RSV antigen was detected in 84 (13%) children, the prevalence being 19% (41/219) among infants aged < 6 months, 12% (22/184) in infants aged 6–11 months, and 9% (21/230) in older children. Sensitivity of antigen detection was higher in NPA (92% in analyses in Guinea-Bissau and 98% in Denmark) than in NS (63% in analyses in Guinea-Bissau, 71% in Denmark). Specificity of RSV antigen detection was equally high in NPA and NS (99–100%). Time since onset of symptoms was significantly shorter in RSV antigen positive than negative samples. Sensitivity did not depend on clinical setting or age of the child.

CONCLUSION Using NS samples was associated with a 27–31% reduction in sensitivity compared with NPA specimens. As NPAs are costly and considered a nuisance by the population, it might be cost-effective in larger epidemiological studies to lose 25–30% in sensitivity but be able to collect samples from a much larger population.

Keywords: nasal swab; nasopharyngeal aspirate; respiratory syncytial virus

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00867.x

Affiliations: 1: Projecto de Saúde de Bandim, Bissau, Guinea-Bissau, 2: Department of Epidemiology Research, Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3: Department of Virology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Publication date: April 1, 2002

Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more