Skip to main content

Comparison of three antigen detection methods for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of malaria: a field study from southern Vietnam

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES To compare the sensitivity, specificity and post-treatment persistence of three commonly used rapid antigen detection methods.

METHOD We studied 252 Vietnamese patients aged from 4 to 60 years, 157 with falciparum and 95 with vivax malaria and 160 healthy volunteers. An initial blood sample was taken for microscopy, and OptiMAL®, immunochromatographic test (ICT) malaria P.f./P.v.® and Paracheck-Pf® tests. Patients with falciparum malaria were treated with an artesunate-based combination regimen and those with vivax malaria received chloroquine. Eighty-seven patients with falciparum malaria who were initially positive for one of the antigen tests and who remained blood smear-negative underwent follow-up testing over 28 days.

RESULTS Paracheck-Pf® was the most sensitive test for Plasmodium falciparum (95.8% vs. 82.6% for ICT malaria P.f./P.v.® and 49.7% for OptiMAL®). Specificities were all 100%. For vivax malaria, OptiMAL® performed better than ICT malaria P.f./P.v.® (sensitivities 73.7% and 20.0%, respectively), with 100% specificity in both cases. All tests had low sensitivities (≤ 75.0%) at parasitaemias < 1000/μl regardless of malaria species. During follow-up, Paracheck-Pf® remained positive in the greatest proportion of patients, especially at higher parasitaemias (> 10 000/μl). Residual OptiMAL® positivity occurred only in a relatively small proportion of patients (< 10%) with parasitaemias > 10 000/μl during the first 2 weeks after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS Although microscopy remains the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, Paracheck-Pf® may prove a useful adjunctive test in uncomplicated falciparum malaria in southern Vietnam. OptiMAL® had the lowest sensitivity for P. falciparum but it might have a use in the diagnosis of vivax malaria and perhaps to monitor efficacy of treatment for falciparum malaria where microscopy is unavailable.

Keywords: ICT malaria P.f./P.v.®; OptiMAL®; Paracheck-Pf®; antigen detection; diagnosis; falciparum malaria; vivax malaria

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00869.x

Affiliations: 1: National Institute of Malariology, Parasitology and Entomology, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2: Vietnam–Australia Malaria Control Project, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam,

Publication date: 2002-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more