Free Content Effect of hypoxia on the hypopnoeic and apnoeic threshold for CO2 in sleeping humans

Authors: Ailiang Xie; James B. Skatrud; Jerome A. Dempsey

Source: The Journal of Physiology, Volume 535, Number 1, August 2001 , pp. 269-278(10)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

You have access to the full text article on a website external to ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Abstract:

• Rhythmic breathing during sleep requires that PCO2 be maintained above a sensitive hypocapnic apnoeic threshold. Hypoxia causes periodic breathing during sleep that can be prevented or eliminated with supplemental CO2. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hypoxia in changing the difference between the eupnoeic PCO2 and the PCO2 required to produce hypopnoea or apnoea (hypopnoea/apnoeic threshold) in sleeping humans.

• The effect of hypoxia on eupnoeic end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 (PET,CO2) and hypopnoea/apnoeic threshold PET,CO2 was examined in seven healthy, sleeping human subjects. A bilevel pressure support ventilator in a spontaneous mode was used to reduce PET,CO2 in small decrements by increasing the inspiratory pressure level by 2 cmH2O every 2 min until hypopnoea (failure to trigger the ventilator) or apnoea (no breathing effort) occurred. Multiple trials were performed during both normoxia and hypoxia (arterial O2 saturation, Sa,O2= 80 %) in a random order. The hypopnoea/apnoeic threshold was determined by averaging PET,CO2 of the last three breaths prior to each hypopnoea or apnoea.

• Hypopnoeas and apnoeas were induced in all subjects during both normoxia and hypoxia. Hypoxia reduced the eupnoeic PET,CO2 compared to normoxia (42.4 ± 1.3 vs. 45.0 ± 1.1 mmHg, P < 0.001 ). However, no change was observed in either the hypopnoeic threshold PET,CO2 (42.1 ± 1.4 vs. 43.0 ± 1.2 mmHg, P > 0.05 ) or the apnoeic threshold PET,CO2 (41.3 ± 1.2 vs. 41.6 ± 1.0 mmHg, P > 0.05 ). Thus, the difference in PET,CO2 between the eupnoeic and threshold levels was much smaller during hypoxia than during normoxia (-0.2 ± 0.2 vs. -2.0 ± 0.3 mmHg, P < 0.01 for the hypopnoea threshold and -1.1 ± 0.2 vs. -3.4 ± 0.3 mmHg, P < 0.01 for the apnoeic threshold). We concluded that hypoxia causes a narrowing of the difference between the baseline PET,CO2 and the hypopnoea/apnoeic threshold PET,CO2, which could increase the likelihood of ventilatory instability.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00269.x

Publication date: 2001-08-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page