Diagenesis of plattenkalk: examples from the Solnhofen area (Upper Jurassic, southern Germany)

Authors: MUNNECKE, AXEL1; WESTPHAL, HILDEGARD2; KÖLBL-EBERT, MARTINA3

Source: Sedimentology, Volume 55, Number 6, December 2008 , pp. 1931-1946(16)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The Upper Jurassic (Tithonian) plattenkalk successions in the Solnhofen/Eichstätt area consist of alternations of thin-bedded, laminated, fine-grained, very pure limestones (so-called `flinz beds') and softer interlayers with slightly lower carbonate contents that are also laminated and show a foliaceous weathering appearance (`fäule beds'). These successions are world famous for their exceptionally well-preserved fossils. In contrast to the well-studied wealth of fossils, little is known about the origin and diagenesis of the host rock. The reason for this discrepancy might lay in the monotonous appearance of these fine-grained mudstones that require electron microscopical examination. Study of samples from the Solnhofen-Eichstädt area implies that flinz and fäule beds have undergone differential diagenesis. The ultrastructure of the flinz beds is characterized by interlocking microspar crystals, whereas the fäule beds show smaller and less interlocking crystals. The ratios of diagenetically inert trace elements lack clear differences between the two interlayered lithologies. While most authors agree that the flinz-fäule rhythm reflects rhythmically changing environmental conditions, primary rhythms can be taken as proven only where statistically significant differences in diagenetically resistant proxies are found. The absence of clear primary differences between flinz and fäule beds, however, leaves the question of primary differences unsolved. It is concluded that diagenesis has had a strong influence on the genesis of the lithological rhythm, and that any primary rhythm underlying the diagenetically mature rhythm is less clear than generally assumed.

Keywords: Aragonite; diagenesis; Jurassic; lithographic limestones; microspar; plattenkalk; southern Germany

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00975.x

Affiliations: 1: GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Fachgruppe Paläoumwelt, Universität Erlangen, Loewenichstraße 28, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany ( ), Email: axel.munnecke@pal.uni-erlangen.de 2: Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen, Leobener Straße, D-28359 Bremen, Germany 3: Jura-Museum Eichstätt, Willibaldsburg, D-85072 Eichstätt, GermanyAssociate Editor: Adrian Immenhauser

Publication date: 2008-12-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page