IngentaConnect Total lung capacity: Single breath methane dilution versus plethy...

Abstract:

Total lung capacity: Single breath methane dilution versus plethysmography in normals

PESOLA GR, MAGARI RT, DARTEY-HAYFORD S, COELHO-D'COSTA V, CHINCHILLI VM. Respirology 2007; 12: 291-294 Objective and background:

Methane is an inert tracer gas used to obtain TLC estimates during single breath diffusion capacity (DL_CO) measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of methane dilution TLC in normal subjects undergoing single breath diffusion capacity measurements using plethysmography as the gold standard comparison method. Methods:

Fifty non-smoking adults underwent lung function testing. Total lung volume was obtained by both plethysmography and methane dilution during a single breath DL_CO measurement. Deming regression and the concordance correlation coefficient, r(ccc), were used to determine agreement between methods for TLC. Bias was the mean difference between methods and limits of agreement were the mean difference between methods ± 1.96 (SD). All values are mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Results:

Plethysmography and methane dilution TLC values were not significantly different. The r(ccc) was 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.92). Deming regression revealed a slope of 0.93 (P = 0.17, H_o: β = 1.0; 95% CI 0.84-1.03) and a y-intercept of 0.20 (P = 0.39, H_o: α = 0; 95% CI −0.27-0.70). The bias was 0.11 L favouring plethysmography. Limits of agreement varied as 0.11 ± 0.92 L. Conclusions:

There is statistical agreement between methods suggesting the average TLC by methane could substitute for plethysmography in normals at the population level. At the individual level, a normal methane dilution value indicates a normal TLC whereas values below the normal range should be validated using plethysmography.

Keywords: agreement between methods; methane dilution; plethysmography; TLC

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.01040.x

Affiliations: 1: Statistician, Cooper City, Florida, and 2: Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harlem Hospital/Columbia University, New York, New York, 3: Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax Refund Policy