Skip to main content

Spirituality and reductionism: three replies

Buy Article:

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

Several authors have commented on my reductionist account of spirituality in nursing, describing it variously as na├»ve, disrespectful, demeaning, paternalistic, arrogant, reifying, indicative of a closed mind, akin to positivism, a procrustean bed, a perpetuation of fraud, a matter of faith, an attempt to secure ideological power, and a perspective that puritanically forbids interesting philosophical topics. In responding to this list of felonies and misdemeanours, I try to justify my excesses by arguing that the critics have not really understood what reductionism involves; that rejecting reductionism is not the same as providing arguments against it; that the ethical dilemmas allegedly associated with reductionist views are endemic to health care; that ‘reifying’ is what believers in the spiritual realm do; and that the closed minds belong to those who dismiss reductionist science without having studied its achievements.

Keywords: ethics; faith; ideology; psychology; reductionism; spirituality

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00439.x

Publication date: July 1, 2010

bsc/nup/2010/00000011/00000003/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more