Skip to main content

Mad, sad or bad. Moral luck and Michael Stone

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract

This paper discusses the philosophical doctrine of moral luck, as described by Bernard Williams in his book of the same name. It first describes Williams' account and then uses the case of Michael Stone, a convicted murderer with a long history of mental disorder, and mental health practitioners’ interventions in his case, to test and debate Williams’ views. It examines four major areas of these, including the classical notion of moral luck, retroactive judgement, agent regret and justifiable and unjustifiable decision-making. It concludes that, in view of what has been said, whilst Williams’ views are applicable and appropriate to many areas of the Stone case, ‘traditional’ moral views on rights, obligations and principles cannot be entirely laid aside in evaluating this.

Keywords: agent regret; judgement; justification; mental health practitioners; moral luck

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-769x.2000.00024.x

Affiliations: Nursing Co-ordinator of the Philosophy and Ethics of Mental Health Programme, University of Warwick., Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Publication date: 2000-10-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more