If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

A study of a multi-source feedback system for international medical graduates holding defined licences

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:



To develop and assess the feasibility and psychometric properties of multi-source feedback questionnaires to monitor international medical graduates practising in Canada under ‘defined’ licences. Method 

Four questionnaires (patient, co-worker, colleague and self) were developed and administered in 2 phases through paper-based and telephone or Internet formats. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and generalisability coefficient analyses. Validity was established through mean ratings, ‘unable to respond’ rates and factor analyses. Results 

A total of 37 doctors participated in the 2 phases. Overall response rates were 70% for patients, 86% for co-workers, 72% for medical colleagues and 92% for self, with response rates higher for the paper-based format than the Internet and phone formats. The instruments had high internal consistency reliability, with Cronbach's alphas of 0.83 for self-assessment and > 0.90 for the other instruments. The generalisability coefficients were Ep2 = 0.71 for 25 patients on a 13-item survey, Ep2 = 0.59 for 8 co-workers on a 13-item survey, and Ep2 = 0.67 for 8 colleagues on a 21-item questionnaire. The range of mean scores was narrow (between 4 and 5) for all items and all surveys. The factor analyses identified that 2 factors accounted for 70% or more of the variance for the patient and colleague surveys and 60% of the variance for the co-worker survey. Conclusion 

These data suggest that the instruments have reasonable psychometric properties. Traditional survey methods (i.e. paper-based) yielded better results than Internet or phone methods for this group of doctors.

Keywords: *feedback; Canada; accreditation; clinical competence/*standards; education; feasibility studies; foreign medical graduates/*standards; graduate/*standards; licensure; medical; pilot projects; psychometrics; teaching/*methods

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02410.x

Affiliations: 1: Medical Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 2: Department of Continuing Medical Education and Professional Development, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 3: Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 4: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada 5: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 6: Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Publication date: April 1, 2006

Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more