Free Content A two‐dimensional approach to assessing affective states in good and poor sleepers

You have access to the full text article on a website external to ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on Wiley Online Library.

You may be required to register and activate access on Wiley Online Library before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please visit Wiley Online Library

Download Article:

Abstract:

Summary

This study examined a two‐dimensional approach to assessing affective states among good and poor sleepers using the self‐assessment manikin (SAM), a brief non‐verbal self‐report measure of affective states with separate ratings of valence and arousal. A sample of 286 undergraduate students completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the SAM. Participants were classified post hoc as either good (PSQI ≤ 5) or poor sleepers (PSQI > 5) using the PSQI and used the SAM to rate their current affective states (day) and their affective state at bedtime (night) the previous night. Compared to good sleepers, poor sleepers reported more negative affect and arousal at night and more negative affect during the day. Among poor sleepers, lower sleep quality and shorter sleep duration on the components of the PSQI were associated with more negative daytime valence. Among good sleepers, higher scores on the sleep medication and daytime dysfunction components of the PSQI were associated with more negative daytime valence. These findings indicate that the SAM appears to detect differences between good and poor sleepers on both valence and arousal of current daytime and retrospective night‐time emotional states. This approach could be useful for the assessment of affective states related to sleep disturbance.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2011.00907.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA 2: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA 3: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Publication date: December 1, 2011

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more