Quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales

Authors: JENKINS, S. J.1; LYNCH, C. D.2; SLOAN, A. J.2; GILMOUR, A. S. M.3

Source: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Volume 36, Number 2, February 2009 , pp. 150-156(7)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Summary 

The aim of this investigation was to describe the quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales. One hundred pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to commercial laboratories in Wales with large catchment areas, and 20 pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to the production laboratory at the Cardiff Dental Hospital. Information was collected relating to the quality of prescription and master impressions for single-unit crowns. One hundred and seven completed questionnaires were returned (response rate = 89%). Sixty per cent (n = 64) of questionnaires related to single-unit crowns being made in general practice under private funding arrangements, 30% (n = 32) were being made in general dental practice under National Health Service (public) funding arrangements and 10% (n = 11) were collected from the Dental Hospital. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used to record the master impression in all cases (n = 107). Plastic stock trays were used to make the master impression in 79% of cases (n = 85), metal stock trays were used in 19% of cases (n = 20) and special trays were used in 2% of cases (n = 2). Eighty-five per cent (n = 91) of master casts were considered to be adequate for crown fabrication. Less than 50% of written instructions (n = 52) were considered `clear' and of sufficient detail to adequately specify the planned crown. In 21% of cases (n = 22), the technician had to contact the dentist for clarification of the design prior to making the crown. While the quality of impression making for single-unit crowns was of a reasonable standard, the quality of the accompanying written communication was poor and more than one-half of written instructions examined failed to meet the requirements of the European Union Medical Devices Directive.

Keywords: crowns; quality; impression; instruction; general dental practice; medicolegal

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01916.x

Affiliations: 1: School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff 2: Tissue Engineering & Reparative Dentistry, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff 3: Teaching & Scholarship, Cardiff University School of Dentistry, Cardiff, UK

Publication date: 2009-02-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page