A description of an intermediate care service using routinely collected data
Authors: Barrett, Jane1; Goh, Suan; Todd, Christopher2; Barclay, Stephen3; Daza-Ramirez, Pascual4; Vardulaki, Katerina5
Source: Journal of Nursing Management, Volume 10, Number 4, July 2002 , pp. 221-227(7)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Abstract:
barrett j.,goh s.,todd c.,barclay s.,daza-ramirez p.&vardulaki k. (2002) Journal of Nursing Management10, -A description of an intermediate care service using routinely collected data Background Intermediate care is a potentially important means of reducing pressures on acute hospitals. However, intermediate care itself is a heterogeneous concept, so to make appropriate comparisons it is important to be able to describe and to group different types of intermediate care services. The aim of this study was to explore the information available from routine data sources to assess its potential for monitoring performance. Methods A retrospective examination of routine community-based data for a newly established intermediate care nursing service over a 12-month period from April 1998 to March 1999. Results The service provided out-of-hours community nursing care for 903 patients in 1071 episodes of care and 6033 recorded contacts. Although information about patient characteristics and episode start-dates were complete, over half the episode end-dates were missing. The data suggested that this was primarily a domiciliary service for people aged 65 years and over, covering six main care programmes: genito-urinary, neoplasm, wound management, elderly care, gastro-intestinal and locomotor care. Most of the referrals were from primary care clinicians. Conclusion Using routine data can provide a reasonably good description of services, enabling appropriate comparisons of similar services. At present, the way we view and count activity can fragment services and increase the stress on clinicians. We need to shift our service-focused approach to a patient-centred one. This can be done now by consistent use of patient identifiers and by encouraging services to plan data linkage. But a gap still remains with regards to outcomes, limiting our ability to measure effectiveness.Keywords: intermediate care; primary care; routine data
Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2834.2002.00291.x
Affiliations: 1: Research Associate, 2: Professor of Primary Care and Community Health, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Visiting, Coupland III, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, 3: General Practitioner and Health Services Research Training Fellow, Health Services Research Group, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, 4: Specialist Registrar, Cambridgeshire Health Authority, Kingfisher House, Kingfisher Way, Huntingdon and 5: Research Fellow, Health Services Research Unit, School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
Publication date: 2002-07-01
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Nursing
- By this author: Barrett, Jane ; Goh, Suan ; Todd, Christopher ; Barclay, Stephen ; Daza-Ramirez, Pascual ; Vardulaki, Katerina

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions