Skip to main content

Research Malpractice and the Issue of Incidental Findings

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Human subject research involving brain imaging is likely to reveal signifcant incidental fndings of abnormal brain morphology. Because of this fact and because of the fduciary relationship between researcher and subject, board-certi-fed or board-eligible radiologists should review the scans to look for any abnormality, the scans should be conducted in accordance with standard medical practice for reviewing the clinical status of the whole brain, and the informed consent process should disclose the possibility that incidental fndings may be revealed and what consequences will follow. In the event such fndings are revealed, qualifed physicians should explain to the subject the signifcance of the fndings and the alternatives available.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00280.x

Affiliations: With the Pennsauken, NJ law firm of Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky.

Publication date: June 1, 2008

bsc/jlme/2008/00000036/00000002/art00016
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more