Skip to main content

Empirical Analysis of Current Approaches to Incidental Findings

The full text article is not available.

At present, only title information is available on for this article. This is due to copyright restrictions.


This paper presents results found through searching publicly available U.S. data sources for information about how to handle incidental fndings (IF) in human subjects research, especially in genetics and genomics research, neuroimaging research, and CT colonography research. We searched the Web sites of 14 federal agencies, 22 professional societies, and 100 universities, as well as used the search engine Google for actual consent forms that had been posted on the Internet. Our analysis of these documents showed that there is very little public guidance available for researchers as to how to deal with incidental fndings. Moreover, the guidance available is not consistent.

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: 1: Associate Vice President for Research at the University of Minnesota and Wallace Professor of Teaching and Learning in Educational Psychology. 2: Candidate for a Master of Arts degree in Health Journalism at the University of Minnesota and has served as a Research Assistant for the University's Consortium on Law and Values in Health, Environment & the Life Sciences.

Publication date: 2008-06-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more