The relationship between intellectual disability, Indigenous status and risk of reoffending in juvenile offenders on community orders

Authors: Frize, M.; Kenny, D.1; Lennings, C.1

Source: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Volume 52, Number 6, June 2008 , pp. 510-519(10)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$47.44 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

Background 

Intellectual disability (ID), age and aboriginal status have been independently implicated as risk factors for offending to varying degrees. This study examined the relationship between age, ID and the Indigenous status of juvenile offenders. It also examined the outcomes of the sample's offending in terms of court appearances and sentencing, criminogenic needs and risk of reoffending. Method 

The sample comprised 800 juvenile offenders on community orders of whom 19% were Indigenous, who completed the New South Wales Young People on Community Order Health Survey between 2003 and 2005. Risk and criminogenic needs were evaluated using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (Australian Adaptation) (YLS/CMI: AA). Results 

Those with an ID were found to have a higher risk of reoffending than those without an ID. Those with an ID were also more likely to be younger and Indigenous. For Indigenous young offenders, there was no difference between those with and without an ID in risk category allocation or number of court dates. For non-Indigenous young offender, those with an ID had higher risk scores and more court dates. Conclusions 

This study provided evidence that Indigenous status may play a significant role in the relationship between ID and offending in juvenile offenders on community orders. These findings have clear implications for the `risk', `needs' and `responsivity' principles of offender classification for treatment. Emphasis is placed on the requirement for addressing the needs of Indigenous juvenile offenders with an ID.

Keywords: criminogenic needs; Indigenous; intellectual disability; juvenile offenders; recidivism; risk assessment

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01058.x

Affiliations: 1: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A