Skip to main content

Socioeconomic differences in food preference and their influence on healthy food purchasing choices

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Background: Studies have shown that socioeconomic groups differ in their dietary behaviours, and it has been suggested that these differences partly account for health inequalities between social groups. To‐date, however, we have a limited understanding of why socioeconomic groups differ in their dietary behaviours. This paper addresses this issue by examining the relationship between socioeconomic status, food preference (likes and dislikes) and the purchase of ‘healthy’ food (i.e. food consistent with dietary guideline recommendations). Methods: This study was based on a dual‐sample, dual‐method research design. One sample was systematically selected from the Australian Commonwealth electoral roll and the data collected using a mail‐survey methodology (81% response rate, n=403). The second consisted of a convenience sample of economically disadvantaged people recruited via welfare agencies (response rate unknown, n=70). A mail survey methodology was deemed inappropriate for this sample, so the data were collected by personally delivering the questionnaire to each respondent. Results: Socioeconomic groups differed significantly in their food purchasing choices and preferences. The food choices of respondents in the welfare sample were the least consistent with dietary guideline recommendations, and they reported liking fewer healthy foods (all results were independent of age and sex). Notably, socioeconomic differences in preference explained approximately 10% of the socioeconomic variability in healthy food purchasing behaviour. Conclusion: Whilst it is not clear why socioeconomic groups differ in their food preferences, possible reasons include: reporting bias, differential exposure to healthy food as a consequence of the variable impact of health promotion campaigns, structural and economic barriers to the procurement of these foods, and subculturally specific beliefs, values, meanings, etc.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Original Article

Affiliations: Queensland University of Technology, School of Public Health, (Centre for Public Health Research), QLD, Australia

Publication date: 1998-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more