The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community
Authors: Debra Saliba1; Marc Elliott1; Laurence Z. Rubenstein1; David H. Solomon1; Roy T. Young1; Caren J. Kamberg1; RN Carol Roth1; Catherine H. MacLean1; Paul G. Shekelle1; Elizabeth M. Sloss1; Neil S. Wenger1
Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Volume 49, Number 12, December 2001 , pp. 1691-1699(9)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
J Am Geriatr Soc 49:16911699, 2001. OBJECTIVES: To develop a simple method for identifying community-dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self-reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function-based survey. DESIGN: Analysis of longitudinal survey data. SETTING: A nationally representative community-based survey. PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand two hundred five Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey; development and comparison of scoring systems that use age, function, and self-reported diagnoses to predict future death and functional decline. RESULTS: A multivariate model using function, self-rated health, and age to predict death or functional decline was only slightly improved when self-reported diagnoses and conditions were included as predictors and was significantly better than a model using age plus self-reported diagnoses alone. These analyses provide the basis for a 13-item function-based scoring system that considers age, self-rated health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. A score of
3 targeted 32% of this nationally representative sample as vulnerable. This targeted group had 4.2 times the risk of death or functional decline over a 2-year period compared with those with scores <3. The receiver operating characteristics curve had an area of .78. An alternative scoring system that included self-reported diagnoses did not substantially improve predictive ability when compared with a function-based scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: A function-based targeting system effectively and efficiently identifies older people at risk of functional decline and death. Self-reported diagnoses and conditions, when added to the system, do not enhance predictive ability. The function-based targeting system relies on self-report and is easily transported across care settings.
Keywords: function; mortality; frail; risk; survey
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content

Click here for Page Help