The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community

Authors: Debra Saliba; Marc Elliott; Laurence Z. Rubenstein; David H. Solomon; Roy T. Young; Caren J. Kamberg; RN Carol Roth; Catherine H. MacLean; Paul G. Shekelle; Elizabeth M. Sloss; Neil S. Wenger

Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Volume 49, Number 12, December 2001 , pp. 1691-1699(9)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1691–1699, 2001. OBJECTIVES:

To develop a simple method for identifying community-dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self-reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function-based survey. DESIGN:

Analysis of longitudinal survey data. SETTING:

A nationally representative community-based survey. PARTICIPANTS:

Six thousand two hundred five Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS:

Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey; development and comparison of scoring systems that use age, function, and self-reported diagnoses to predict future death and functional decline. RESULTS:

A multivariate model using function, self-rated health, and age to predict death or functional decline was only slightly improved when self-reported diagnoses and conditions were included as predictors and was significantly better than a model using age plus self-reported diagnoses alone. These analyses provide the basis for a 13-item function-based scoring system that considers age, self-rated health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. A score of ge3 targeted 32% of this nationally representative sample as vulnerable. This targeted group had 4.2 times the risk of death or functional decline over a 2-year period compared with those with scores <3. The receiver operating characteristics curve had an area of .78. An alternative scoring system that included self-reported diagnoses did not substantially improve predictive ability when compared with a function-based scoring system. CONCLUSIONS:

A function-based targeting system effectively and efficiently identifies older people at risk of functional decline and death. Self-reported diagnoses and conditions, when added to the system, do not enhance predictive ability. The function-based targeting system relies on self-report and is easily transported across care settings.

Keywords: function; mortality; frail; risk; survey

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x

Affiliations: 1: RAND, Santa Monica, California;

Publication date: 2001-12-01

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page