The Vulnerable Elders Survey: A Tool for Identifying Vulnerable Older People in the Community

Authors: Debra Saliba1; Marc Elliott1; Laurence Z. Rubenstein1; David H. Solomon1; Roy T. Young1; Caren J. Kamberg1; RN Carol Roth1; Catherine H. MacLean1; Paul G. Shekelle1; Elizabeth M. Sloss1; Neil S. Wenger1

Source: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Volume 49, Number 12, December 2001 , pp. 1691-1699(9)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1691–1699, 2001. OBJECTIVES:

To develop a simple method for identifying community-dwelling vulnerable older people, defined as persons age 65 and older at increased risk of death or functional decline. To assess whether self-reported diagnoses and conditions add predictive ability to a function-based survey. DESIGN:

Analysis of longitudinal survey data. SETTING:

A nationally representative community-based survey. PARTICIPANTS:

Six thousand two hundred five Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS:

Bivariate and multivariate analyses of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey; development and comparison of scoring systems that use age, function, and self-reported diagnoses to predict future death and functional decline. RESULTS:

A multivariate model using function, self-rated health, and age to predict death or functional decline was only slightly improved when self-reported diagnoses and conditions were included as predictors and was significantly better than a model using age plus self-reported diagnoses alone. These analyses provide the basis for a 13-item function-based scoring system that considers age, self-rated health, limitation in physical function, and functional disabilities. A score of ge3 targeted 32% of this nationally representative sample as vulnerable. This targeted group had 4.2 times the risk of death or functional decline over a 2-year period compared with those with scores <3. The receiver operating characteristics curve had an area of .78. An alternative scoring system that included self-reported diagnoses did not substantially improve predictive ability when compared with a function-based scoring system. CONCLUSIONS:

A function-based targeting system effectively and efficiently identifies older people at risk of functional decline and death. Self-reported diagnoses and conditions, when added to the system, do not enhance predictive ability. The function-based targeting system relies on self-report and is easily transported across care settings.

Keywords: function; mortality; frail; risk; survey

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49281.x

Affiliations: 1: RAND, Santa Monica, California;

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A