IngentaConnect Reporting and Concordance of Methodologic Criteria Between Abstra...

Authors: Estrada, Carlos A.¹; Bloch, Richard M.¹; Antonacci, Diana¹; Basnight, L. Lorraine¹; Patel, Sangnya R.¹; Patel, Sanjay C.¹; Wiese, Wilhelmine¹

Source: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Volume 15, Number 3, March 2000 , pp. 183-187(5)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the quality and concordance of methodologic criteria in abstracts versus articles regarding the diagnosis of trichomoniasis. STUDY DESIGN:

Survey of published literature. DATA SOURCES:

Studies indexed inmedline(1976-1998). STUDY SELECTION:

Studies that used culture as the gold or reference standard. DATA EXTRACTION:

Data from abstract and articles were independently abstracted using 4 methodologic criteria: (1) prospective evaluation of consecutive patients; (2) test results did not influence the decision to do gold standard; (3) independent and blind comparison with gold standard; and (4) broad spectrum of patients used. The total number of criteria met for each report was calculated to create a quality score (0-4). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

None of the 33 abstracts or full articles reported all 4 criteria. Three criteria were reported in none of the abstracts and in 18% of articles (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 8.6% to 34%). Two criteria were reported in 18% of abstracts (95% CI, 8.6% to 34%) and 42% of articles (95% CI, 27% to 59%). One criterion was reported in 42% of abstracts (95% CI, 27% to 59%) and 27% of articles (95% CI, 15% to 44%). No criteria were reported in 13 (39%) of 33 abstracts (95% CI, 25% to 56%) and 4 (12%) of 33 articles (95% CI, 4.8% to 27%). The agreement of the criteria between the abstract and the article was poor (κ−0.09; 95% CI, −0.18 to 0) to moderate (κ 0.53; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS:

Information on methods basic to study validity is often absent from both abstract and paper. The concordance of such criteria between the abstract and article needs to improve.

Keywords: evidence-based medicine; periodicals; publishing; quality control; sensitivity and specificity; diagnosis

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.03189.x

Affiliations: 1: East Carolina University School of Medicine, Greenville, NC

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on InterScience.

You may be required to register and activate access on InterScience before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please contact onlinehelp@oxon.blackwellpublishing.com

Reporting and Concordance of Methodologic Criteria Between Abstracts and Articles in Diagnostic Test Studies