Addressing the National Academy of Sciences’ Challenge: A Method for Statistical Pattern Comparison of Striated Tool Marks
Abstract: In February 2009, the National Academy of Sciences published a report entitled “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward.” The report notes research studies must be performed to “…understand the reliability and
repeatability…” of comparison methods commonly used in forensic science. Numerical classification methods have the ability to assign objective quantitative measures to these words. In this study, reproducible sets of ideal striation patterns were made with nine slotted screwdrivers,
encoded into high‐dimensional feature vectors, and subjected to multiple statistical pattern recognition methods. The specific methods employed were chosen because of their long peer‐reviewed track records, widespread successful use for both industry and academic applications,
rely on few assumptions on the data’s underlying distribution, can be accompanied by standard confidence levels, and are falsifiable. For PLS‐DA, correct classification rates of 97% or higher were achieved by retaining only eight dimensions (8D) of data. PCA‐SVM required
even fewer dimensions, 4D, for the same level of performance. Finally, for the first time in forensic science, it is shown how to use conformal prediction theory to compute identifications of striation patterns at a given level of confidence.
No Supplementary Data
Document Type: Research Article
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, 899 10th Avenue, New York, NY 10019.
Department of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Forensic Science Program, Cedar Crest College, 100 College Drive, Allentown, PA 18104.
Special Investigations Unit, 421 East 26th Street, New York, NY 10016.
Department of Sciences, Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York, 199 Chambers Street, New York, NY 10007.
Publication date: 2012-07-01