Authors: Steadman, Dawnie Wolfe1; DiAntonio, Lisa L.2; Wilson, Jeremy J.1; Sheridan, Kevin E.1; Tammariello, Steven P.2
Source: Journal of Forensic Sciences, Volume 51, Number 1, January 2006 , pp. 11-17(7)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Abstract:
: Forensic anthropologists use a number of maceration techniques to facilitate skeletal analysis of personal identity and trauma, but they may unwittingly eliminate valuable DNA evidence in the process. This study evaluated the effect of 10 maceration methods on gross bone structure and the preservation of DNA in ribs of 12 pigs (Sus scrofa). A scoring system was applied to evaluate the ease of maceration and resulting bone quality while DNA purity was quantified by optical densitometry analysis, followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of three mitochondrial and three nuclear loci. The results demonstrated that while mitochondrial DNA could be amplified for all experiments, cleaning treatments using bleach, hydrogen peroxide, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid/papain, room temperature water and detergent/sodium carbonate followed by degreasing had low DNA concentrations and failed to generate nuclear PCR products. In general, treatments performed at high temperatures (90°C or above) for short durations performed best. This study shows that traditionally “conservative” maceration techniques are not necessarily the best methods to yield DNA from skeletal tissue.Keywords: forensic science; forensic anthropology; DNA; skeletal preparation; optical densitometry; polymerase chain reaction; maceration
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00001.x
Affiliations: 1: Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, SUNY, PO Box 6000, Binghamton, NY. 2: Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, SUNY, PO Box 6000 Binghamton, NY.
Links for this article