Diel vertical migrations of bathypelagic perch fry

Authors: Čech, M.; Kratochvíl, M.; Kubečka, J.; Draštík, V.; Matěna, J.

Source: Journal of Fish Biology, Volume 66, Number 3, March 2005 , pp. 685-702(18)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The behaviour of young-of-the-year (YOY) perch Perca fluviatilis as a dominant species in the assemblage of fry in the pelagic of Slapy Reservoir (Czech Republic), was studied during late May and mid-June 2002 using acoustic methods and complementary net catches. During the day, perch fry were present simultaneously in littoral, epipelagic and bathypelagic habitats. Bathypelagic perch fry, forming a scattering layer, migrated vertically each day between the epilimnion and hypolimnion, with an amplitude of 11·0 m in May and 12·5 m in June. At dusk, the migratory bathypelagic fry mixed in the epilimnion with non-migrating epipelagic fry and spent the night close to the thermocline (abundance maximum at 3–4 m in May, 0–2 m in June). In June, shoaling behaviour by some of the bathypelagic perch fry was also observed: the shoaling fry remained higher in the water column than the non-shoaling fry. Both depths of the scattering layer and the depths of the fry shoals were strongly controlled by the light intensity. The contribution of the bathypelagic part of the population to the total numbers of pelagic perch fry decreased from 28·1% in May to 4·7% in June, while the density of all pelagic perch fry increased (c. 96 000 individuals ha−1 in May and 142 000 individuals ha−1 in June). In May, the bathypelagic (average total length, LT, 11·9 mm) and epipelagic (average LT 14·6 mm) perch fry differed in size while, in June, the epipelagic fry were divided into two distinct size groups. The more abundant group, of small epipelagic perch fry (average LT 14·6 mm), was similar in size to the bathypelagic fry (average LT 14·6 mm) while the less abundant group, of larger epipelagic fry (average LT 34·4 mm), was similar in size to littoral perch fry (average LT 35·0 mm). The results suggest that in perch fry three different survival strategies with different risks can be used in the same locality, time and year.

Keywords: echosounder; fry distribution; Gymnocephalus cernuus; ichthyoplankton; Sander lucioperca; Slapy Reservoir

Document Type: Regular paper

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00630.x

Affiliations: 1: Hydrobiological Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Na sádkách 7, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Publication date: 2005-03-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page