Skip to main content

Spatial and ecometric analyses of the Plio‐Pleistocene large mammal communities of the Italian peninsula

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract
Aim

Knowledge of mammal community composition across large areas is critical to the reconstruction of biogeographical trends in past ecosystems where mammalian fossils serve as palaeoecological proxies. We employed ‘ecometrics’ (taxon‐free trait analysis) to compare fossil communities of the Italian Plio‐Pleistocene across space and time. We tested the hypotheses that ecometric traits characterizing fossil mammal communities differ between time bins, and that they exhibit geographical correlations.
Location

Peninsular Italy, excluding islands (Sardinia and Sicily).
Methods

We explored selected ecometric traits (body weight, biomass, hypsodonty and brachial index) in 69 local fossil assemblages at the scale of nine palaeocommunities (PCOMs), and at the broader scale of ‘mammal age’, or biochronological unit, to which they belong: Villafranchian, Galerian or Aurelian. Principal components analysis, MANOVA and linear discriminant analysis were used to describe differences in the PCOM and mammal age ecospaces. We also tested for the effects of latitude and longitude on the ecometric variables and mapped their distributions during individual mammal ages.
Results

Spatial analysis suggested that neither latitude nor longitude relate meaningfully to any of the ecological parameters under consideration. However, PCOMs in each biochronological interval were successfully discriminated using ecometric traits, with the exception of the localities from Triversa and Pirro, which bore more resemblance to the younger Aurelian localities. The mammal ages were more clearly distinct.
Main conclusions

Communities differ from one another particularly in relation to both the average body weight of herbivores and the entire mammalian fauna and the biomass of prey species. This is probably related to a climatic cooling trend that occurred between the Pliocene and Pleistocene and resulted in the evolution of larger forms. Hypsodonty trends are identified and we support hypsodonty as a valuable ecometric trait, but only at larger temporal scales.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12113

Publication date: August 1, 2013

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more