Skip to main content

The generality of the island rule reexamined

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Abstract Aim 

M.V. Lomolino and colleagues have recently reviewed the island rule in mammals and other vertebrates, claiming it is a general pattern. They have portrayed our recent analysis as weakly supporting the island rule, seeing weakness in our use of what they considered to be inadequate size indices (skulls and teeth, rather than mass or body length) and in our use of large islands. They argue that size evolution on islands points to a bauplan-specific fundamental size. We aim to test the generality of the rule and the adequacy of some of the data used to support it. Location 

Insular environments world-wide. Methods 

We collate and analyse data on skull sizes of carnivores and body masses of mammals in general to see whether there is a graded trend from dwarfism in large species to gigantism in smaller ones. Results 

The island rule is not supported with either the carnivore or the mammal data sets. Island area does not influence size change. Main conclusions 

Our results suggest that data recently advanced in support of the island rule are inadequate and that the island rule is not a general pattern for all mammals.

Keywords: Bauplan; body mass; body size evolution; carnivores; fundamental size; geographic variation; island area; island rule; size indices; skull length

Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: 1: Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel 2: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

Publication date: September 1, 2006


Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more