Skip to main content

Predicting savanna vegetation structure on the basis of plant available moisture (PAM) and plant available nutrients (PAN): a case study from Australia

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The use of the plant available moisture (PAM)/plant available nutrients (PAN) concept to compare savanna structure was examined using data from twenty Australian sites. Above-ground biomass was regressed on various combinations of seventeen different estimates of PAM (plant available moisture) and two estimates of PAN (plant available nutrients). The ratios of actual transpirational loss from the subsoil to potential evapotranspiration (PET), and total annual rainfall to PET, were most highly correlated with total biomass. Grass biomass is poorly predicted by PAM on its own, and requires inclusion of woody leaf biomass in the regression. PAN had little effect on total biomass, although it is likely to be important for other, functional aspects of vegetation. The woody : grass ratio is best predicted by an index involving the ratio of subsoil : topsoil moisture. For biomass comparisons the use of a detailed water-balance model to estimate PAM is not warranted.

Keywords: Australia; biomass; nutrients; savanna; soil moisture; subtropical; tropical

Document Type: Original Article


Affiliations: CSIRO, Division of Wildlife and Ecology, PO Box 84, Lyneham, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2602

Publication date: 1997-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more