Skip to main content

No evidence or no alternative? Taking responsibility for off‐label prescribing

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is registered for patients with rare haematological disorders, but is used ‘off‐label’ in many other situations, including intracranial haemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, transplantation and prostatectomy. Lack of systematic evidence to support these off‐label uses has not slowed the growth of off‐label prescribing of rFVIIa. We use the case of rFVIIa to illustrate the issues raised by off‐label prescribing, and the kind of impasse that can arise when views about evidence, expertise and clinical necessity are in conflict. We argue that clinicians, hospital drug committees and regulators all need to acknowledge the complexity of prescribing decisions, and ensure that decisions to prescribe off‐label are sufficiently justified.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Australian Institute of Health Innovation

Publication date: 2012-03-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more