Skip to main content

Doctors’ perceptions of the prognostic benefit of statins in patients who have had myocardial infarction

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract Background:

We wished to assess how General Practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists perceive and communicate the benefits of therapy with statins (hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) in a patient following myocardial infarction. Methods:

We interviewed 20 GPs and 22 cardiologists to determine treatment policy and ways of expressing its benefits to a patient after myocardial infarction with moderate dyslipidaemia. We asked what drug and dosage they would recommend and how they would express potential benefits of therapy, given a range of options including reduced relative and absolute risk of events. Results:

Most GPs would start a low dose (10–20 mg/day) of simvastatin (the only freely prescribable funded statin in New Zealand) whereas cardiologists would commence 40 mg/day immediately (P = 0.001). All but one cardiologist would justify therapy to the patient by citing a reduced chance of a major adverse cardiovascular event. Nine GPs and one cardiologist estimated a gain of more than 5 years of life from statin therapy. Cardiologists were more optimistic than GPs about relative risk reduction (P = 0.04). Only 50% of GPs and 68% of cardiologists were able to estimate an absolute risk reduction over 5 years, such estimates varying widely with no significant difference in responses between the groups (P = 0.2). No doctors felt comfortable using number needed to treat or odds ratio. Conclusion:

There were substantial differences between the two groups of clinicians in perception and policy of statin therapy, frequent overestimation of treatment benefits and a reluctance to impart numerical estimates of benefit to patients.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: communication; hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor; patient acceptance of health care; risk assessment; secondary prevention

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2009-05-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more