If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Australasian haematologist referral patterns to palliative care: lack of consensus on when and why

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:


Abstract Background: 

Patients with haematological malignancies are not referred to palliative care services as frequently as those with solid cancers (non haematological malignancies). Aims: 

The present study surveyed haematologists in Australia and New Zealand. We aimed to record theoret­ical referral times, identify problems with referral to palliative care and clarify elements used to decide whether a patient was ‘terminally ill’. Methods:

A questionnaire based on the case-histories of three patients (with acute leukaemia, lymphoma or mul­tiple myeloma) was distributed at the Haematology Society of Australia and New Zealand Congress 2000, Perth, Australia. Each case was divided into stages by transitional points in the illness to include issues or prognostic variables that may stimulate referral to ­palliative care. Questions were asked about: (i) referral ­triggers, (ii) problems previously experienced, (iii) definition of when the patient was ‘terminally ill’, (iv) prognostication difficulties and (v) communication about prognosis. Results:

The response rate was 11%, which may represent up to 32% of Australian specialists. Eighty per cent had access to all types of palliative care services and refer for symptom control, regardless of illness stage. Twenty-nine per cent had experienced difficulties in referring. There was a variation as to exactly when referral would occur and when each case was considered ‘terminally ill’. Reasons for early or later referral were explored. Prognostication difficulties were common. Conclusions:

In theory there is a willingness to refer to palliative care, however this has yet to be translated to day-to-day practice. This may be due to prognostication difficulties, logistical factors and medical concerns. Models of referral are suggested for further study. (Intern Med J 2003; 33: 566−571)

Keywords: haematology; palliative care; prognosis; referral and consultation; terminal care

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2003.00490.x

Affiliations: 1: School of Medicine and Pharmacology and 2: School of Population Health, University of Western Australia and 3: Department of Haematology and Director of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Publication date: December 1, 2003

Related content



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more