Should data monitoring committees assess efficacy when considering safety in trials in acute stroke?

Authors: Bath, P. M. W.1; Gray, L. J.1; Wahlgren, N.-G.2

Source: International Journal of Clinical Practice, Volume 61, Number 10, October 2007 , pp. 1749-1755(7)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Summary Background: 

The primary role of a trial's data monitoring committee (DMC) is to ensure the safety of enrolled patients. In stroke trials, safety is monitored typically by comparing death and stroke-specific events between treatment groups. DMCs may also have the remit for monitoring efficacy depending on the aims of the trial. We hypothesised that functional outcome at the end of follow-up, a measure of efficacy, is also a powerful measure of safety and tested this in a systematic review. Methods: 

Acute stroke trials with a negative outcome or which were stopped prematurely on the grounds of safety were sought systematically from searches of electronic databases and published reviews. Information on early and late death, impairment and functional outcome, and the presence of a DMC, were recorded for each trial. The results for each outcome measure were ranked within each trial to determine which was most statistically efficient in detecting hazard. Results: 

Fourteen trials were included. The most efficient outcomes for detecting hazard were late death or disability, six trials; early death, four trials (two of which tested thrombolysis); late death, three trials and late death or impairment, one trial. Early death was insensitive to hazard in all six trials where late death or dependency was most sensitive. Two trials (both phase II) did not report the presence of a DMC. Conclusions: 

Functional outcome at end of follow-up can be sensitive to hazard and should be included in all assessments of safety in stroke trials, whether or not efficacy itself is being assessed.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01471.x

Affiliations: 1: Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 2: Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A