Effect of metformin plus roziglitazone compared with metformin alone on glycaemic control in well-controlled Type 2 diabetes

Authors: Stewart, M. W.; Cirkel, D. T.; Furuseth, K.1; Donaldson, J.2; Biswas, N.3; Starkie, M. G.; Phenekos, C.4; Hamann, A.5

Source: Diabetic Medicine, Volume 23, Number 10, October 2006 , pp. 1069-1078(10)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Aims 

To investigate the effect of metformin plus roziglitazione (RSGMET) compared with metformin alone (MET) on glycaemic control in well-controlled Type 2 diabetes. Methods 

Subjects (drug naïve or those on glucose-lowering monotherapy) were randomized (n = 526), following a 4-week placebo run-in period, to RSGMET [4 mg rosiglitazone (RSG)/500 mg MET] or MET 500 mg. From weeks 2-18, medication was escalated every 4 weeks (based on gastrointestinal tolerability), then remained at RSGMET 8 mg/2 g or MET 3 g for 14 weeks. Results 

RSGMET reduced HbA1c from 7.2 ± 0.6 to 6.7 ± 0.8% at week 32, compared with a reduction from 7.2 ± 0.6 to 6.8 ± 0.9% with MET (treatment difference −0.13%; P = 0.0357). More subjects achieved an HbA1c value of ≤ 6.5% at week 32 with RSGMET (51.6 vs. 43.7%), but the treatment difference was not significant (odds ratio 1.37, P = 0.0949). RSGMET produced larger reductions from baseline in mean fasting plasma glucose (adjusted difference −0.62 mmol/l, P < 0.0001), with the odds ratio of achieving a target of < 7.0 mmol/l being 2.33 (P < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences in favour of RSGMET relative to MET were seen for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-derived estimates of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic B-cell function, C-reactive protein (CRP), and systolic blood pressure. Overall rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (relevant to the known profile of MET) were comparable, but with a lower incidence of diarrhoea (8 vs. 18%) with RSGMET. Hypoglycaemia was reported in ≤ 7% subjects per group. Conclusions 

RSGMET provided similar short-term glycaemic control to MET with greater improvements in estimates of insulin sensitivity, B-cell function and CRP, with less diarrhoea and low risk of biochemical hypoglycaemia, suggesting that early use of combination therapy may be appropriate.

Diabet. Med. 23, 1069-1078 (2006)

Keywords: Avandamet; glycaemic control; HbA1c targets; metformin; Type 2 diabetes

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01942.x

Affiliations: 1: Solli Klinikk, Jessheim, Norway, 2: Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine Development Centre—Clinical, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, Middlesex, UK, 3: Statistics and Programming, Biomedical Data Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA, 4: Korgialenio-Benakio Hospital, Athens, Greece and 5: Uniklinik, Innere Medical I, Heidelberg, Germany

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$49.48 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A