@article {Rosenfalck:April 2006:0742-3071:384,
author = "Rosenfalck, A. M.",
author = "Almdal, T.",
author = "Viggers, L.",
author = "Madsbad, S.",
author = "Hilsted, J.",
title = "A low-fat diet improves peripheral insulin sensitivity in patients with Type1 diabetes",
journal = "Diabetic Medicine",
volume = "23",
year = "April 2006",
abstract = "Aims To compare the effects on insulin sensitivity, body composition and glycaemic control of the recommended standard weight-maintaining diabetes diet and an isocaloric low-fat diabetes diet during two, 3-month periods in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Methods Thirteen Type 1 patients were included, of whom 10 completed the cross-over study. Ten non-diabetic, matched control subjects were also examined. Body composition was estimated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) whole-body scanning, diet intake was monitored by 7-day dietary record and insulin sensitivity was measured by the insulin clamp technique at baseline and after each of the diet intervention periods. Results On an isocaloric low-fat diet, Type 1 diabetic patients significantly reduced the proportion of fat in the total daily energy intake by 12.1% (or −3.6% of total energy) as compared with a conventional diabetes diet (P = 0.039). The daily protein and carbohydrate intake increased (+4.4% of total energy intake, P = 0.0049 and +2.5%, P = 0.34, respectively), while alcohol intake decreased (−3.2% of total energy intake, P = 0.02). There was a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity on the isocaloric, low-fat diet compared with the standard diabetes diet [7.06 ± 2.16 mg/kg/min (mean ± sd) vs. 5.52 ± 2.35 mg/kg/min (P = 0.03)]. However, insulin sensitivity remained 33% lower than in the control subjects (P = 0.021). No significant changes occurred in body weight or body composition. Glycated haemoglobin rose during both diet intervention periods (P = 0.18), with no difference between the two diets. Conclusions Change to an isocaloric, low-fat diet in Type 1 diabetic patients during a 3-month period resulted in significant improvement in insulin sensitivity without improvement in glycaemic control. However, insulin sensitivity remained 33% lower than in control subjects.Diabet. Med. (2006)",
pages = "384-392(9)",
url = "http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/dme/2006/00000023/00000004/art00007"
doi = "doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01810.x"
}