Skip to main content

Short- versus long-term effects of Ohio's switch to more structured sentencing on extralegal disparities in prison sentences in an urban court

Buy Article:

$43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Research Summary

The impact of Ohio's presumptive guidelines on sentencing disparities was examined for one of the state's largest jurisdictions to determine whether the switch to more structured sentencing in 1996 had any enduring effects. Sentencing patterns were examined both before and shortly after the 1996 reform, as well as 9 years later. Findings revealed weaker race and marital status effects on imprisonment under guidelines versus stronger age effects, no changes in disparities based on a defendant's sex and means of support, and (virtually) no changes in the magnitude of legally relevant effects.

Policy Implications

Ohio's guidelines are more flexible relative to other guideline schemes, possibly accounting for the general stability in effects across regimes. Ohio has since transitioned to voluntary guidelines, which raised concerns that the change will yield higher levels of sentencing disparities. Findings suggest that the transition may coincide with no changes in legal effects, yet with greater disparities based on a defendant's race and marital status.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: extralegal disparities; prison sentences; sentencing guidelines

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Professor in the Division of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati.

Publication date: 2009-05-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more