Free Content Public health implications of using various case definitions in The Netherlands during the worldwide SARS outbreak

Authors: Timen, A.1; van Doornum, G. J. J.2; Schutten, M.2; Conyn-van Spaendonck, M. A. E.1; van der Meer, J. W. M.3; Osterhaus, A. D. M. E.2; van Steenbergen, J. E.1

Source: Clinical Microbiology & Infection, Volume 12, Number 12, December 2006 , pp. 1214-1220(7)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

This study analysed the consequences of deviation from the WHO case definition for the assessment of patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in The Netherlands during 2003. Between 17 March and 7 July 2003, as a result of dilemmas in balancing sensitivity and specificity, five different case definitions were used. The patients referred for SARS assessment were analysed from a public health perspective. None of the patients referred had SARS, based on serological and virological criteria. Nevertheless, all 72 patients required thorough assessment and, depending on the results of the assessment, institution of appropriate prevention and control measures. Changing case definitions caused confusion in classifying cases. A centralised assessment of the reported cases by a team with clinical and public health expertise (epidemiological and geographical risk assessment) is a practical solution for addressing differences in applying case definitions. The burden of managing non-cases is an important issue when allocating public health resources, and should be taken into account during the preparation phase, rather than during an outbreak. This applies not only to SARS, but also to other public health threats, such as pandemic influenza or a bioterrorist episode.

Keywords: Assessment; case definition; management; public health threats; risk assessment; SARS

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01552.x

Affiliations: 1: Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven 2: Virology Department, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam and 3: Internal Medicine Department, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

You have access to the full text article on a website external to Ingentaconnect.

Please click here to view this article on InterScience.

You may be required to register and activate access on InterScience before you can obtain the full text. If you have any queries please contact onlinehelp@oxon.blackwellpublishing.com

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A