Contact with livestock - a protective effect against allergies and asthma?

Authors: Dimich-Ward, H.1; Chow, Y.; Chung, J.1; Trask, C.2

Source: Clinical & Experimental Allergy, Volume 36, Number 9, September 2006 , pp. 1122-1129(8)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Summary Background

A `protective farm factor' possibly related to livestock exposure is hypothesized to reduce the risk for allergic sensitization. Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 4-H club youth, who have opportunities for contact with livestock through club activities, have reduced risks of respiratory and allergic symptoms according to residence on a farm or exposure to livestock. Methods

A cross-sectional postal survey was completed by British Columbia 4-H members 8-20 years of age; a subset underwent skin prick testing as well. The association of farm residence and livestock exposure variables with symptoms were evaluated using logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, cat and/or dog ownership, parental history of allergic disease, parental education, number of older siblings and exposure to smokers at home. Results

Questionnaires were completed by 1158 participants (response rate 50.3%); of these, a subset of 317 had skin prick tests (SPTs) (response rate 64.4%). Current residence on a farm was associated with a lower prevalence of ever having wheeze and asthma, as well as symptoms of atopic dermatitis. Variables relating to residence in a farm or rural area with livestock were more strongly associated with respiratory and allergic symptoms than were the livestock exposure variables such as frequency of contact and hours of barn use. The adjusted odds ratios for living in a farm residence in comparison with a rural non-livestock area were 0.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.89) for diagnosed asthma, 0.51 (95% CI 0.30-0.85) for allergic rhinitis and 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.84) for atopic dermatitis. Conclusion

Our findings suggest that some aspects of the farm environment, not just attributable to contact with livestock, were protective for respiratory and allergic conditions among 4-H youth.

Keywords: allergic symptoms; farm; livestock; questionnaires; surveys

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02556.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Medicine, Respiratory Division, University of British Columbia and 2: School of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A