Topical azelastine has a 12-hour duration of action as assessed by histamine challenge-induced exudation of α2-macroglobulin into human nasal airways

Authors: GREIFF, L.1; ANDERSSON, M.1; SVENSSON, C.1; PERSSON, C. G. A.2

Source: Clinical & Experimental Allergy, Volume 27, Number 4, April 1997 , pp. 438-444(7)

Publisher: Blackwell Publishing

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Background Oral anti-histamine drugs are widely used in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Recently, anti-histamines have become available also for topical treatment Objective The present study, involving healthy subjects, examined the effect of topical azelastine on luminal entry of α2-macroglobulin and symptoms evoked by repeat histamine challenges during 24 h. The effect was compared to a clinical dose of the oral anti-histamine cetirizine and to placebo treatments. Methods Placebo and azelastine (0.254 mg per nasal cavity) were delivered as two consecutive actuations per nasal cavity using a nasal spray device. Oral placebo and cetirizine (10 mg) were given as single doses in a placebo-controlled (double-dummy), double-blind, and cross-over design. Histamine-challenges were given 1 h before treatment, and 1, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h after each treatment. The nasal mucosal surface was lavaged after each challenge. The lavage-fluid levels of α2-macroglobulin were determined to assess mucosal exudation of bulk plasma, and nasal symptoms were scored. Results Histamine (40-400 μg/mL) produced dose-dependent exudation and symptoms. Compared between each treatment and placebo, azelastine and cetirizine reduced the 40 and/or 400 μg/mL histamine-induced mucosal exudation of plasma from 1-12 h after treatment. In addition, cetirizine reduced the 40 μg/mL histamine-induced mucosal exudation of plasma 24 h after treatment. Differences between the two treatments were not evident regarding nasal symptoms. Conclusion Histamine challenge-induced mucosal exudation of plasma appears to be a useful method for studies of the duration of action of antihistamines. We conclude that topical azelastine is suited for b.i.d. therapy and that neither the exudative process nor watery secretion may impede the efficacy or the duration of action of this nasal drug.

Keywords: allergy; antihistamine; rhinitis

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1997.d01-527.x

Affiliations: 1: Departments of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 2: Clinical Pharmacology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$50.39 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A