A Biological Framework for Evaluating Whether a Species Is Threatened or Endangered in a Significant Portion of Its Range
Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA), a species can be listed if it is at risk “in all or a significant portion of its range,” but the ESA provides no guidance on how to interpret this key phrase. We propose a simple test to determine whether the areas of a species' range in which it is currently at risk amount to a significant portion: If the species were to become extirpated from these areas, at that point would the entire species be at risk? If so, then these areas represent a significant portion of the species' range. By establishing the species itself as the point of reference for determining significance, this test directs attention to biological risk factors and avoids difficulties inherent in subjective evaluations of importance to humans. For broadly distributed species this framework could provide ESA protection due to cumulative risks before the entire species met the criteria to be considered threatened or endangered. This framework also allows a somewhat broader concept of range to include major components of diversity necessary for long-term persistence. The concept of a historical template (i.e., conditions under which the species was known to be viable) is important in providing a fixed reference point for evaluating viability. Empirical examples illustrate how these concepts have been applied in recent ESA listing determinations. Most ESA-listed units of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) can be divided into multiple strata that differ in terms of ecology, geology, or life-history traits of the component populations. The goal of ESA recovery planning is to restore viable populations in enough strata that the listed unit as a whole is no longer threatened or endangered in all or a significant portion of its range. In a recent review of Pacific herring (Clupea pallasii) in Puget Sound, current status (some populations increasing and others declining) was evaluated in the context of the historical template, and it was concluded that current patterns of distribution and abundance do not depart substantially from what would be expected at any point in time under natural conditions in a large metapopulation. The Canadian lynx (Lynx canadensis) is ESA listed in the contiguous United States, where it occurs in four geographic areas. Populations in one region, the Northern Rockies/Cascades, have always been the most important for long-term persistence of the species in the United States. Because the other regions never contained more than limited amounts of good-quality lynx habitat, those areas are not considered to represent a significant portion of the species' range.
Keywords: Canadian lynx; Endangered Species Act; Lynx canadensis; Pacific herring; Pacific salmon; Salmón del Pacífico; acta de especie en peligro; arenque del Pacífico; dimensión normativa; distribución de la especie; extinction risk; metapoblación; metapopulation; normative dimension; riesgo de extinción; species range
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, WA 98112, U.S.A., Email: [email protected] 2: Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, U.S.A. 3: Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL 33149, U.S.A. 4: Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037, U.S.A.
Publication date: 01 August 2007