Decline in Relative Abundance of Bottlenose Dolphins Exposed to Long-Term Disturbance
Source: Conservation Biology, Volume 20, Number 6, December 2006 , pp. 1791-1798(8)
Studies evaluating effects of human activity on wildlife typically emphasize short-term behavioral responses from which it is difficult to infer biological significance or formulate plans to mitigate harmful impacts. Based on decades of detailed behavioral records, we evaluated long-term impacts of vessel activity on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Australia. We compared dolphin abundance within adjacent 36-km2 tourism and control sites, over three consecutive 4.5-year periods wherein research activity was relatively constant but tourism levels increased from zero, to one, to two dolphin-watching operators. A nonlinear logistic model demonstrated that there was no difference in dolphin abundance between periods with no tourism and periods in which one operator offered tours. As the number of tour operators increased to two, there was a significant average decline in dolphin abundance (14.9%; 95% CI =−20.8 to −8.23), approximating a decline of one per seven individuals. Concurrently, within the control site, the average increase in dolphin abundance was not significant (8.5%; 95% CI =−4.0 to +16.7). Given the substantially greater presence and proximity of tour vessels to dolphins relative to research vessels, tour-vessel activity contributed more to declining dolphin numbers within the tourism site than research vessels. Although this trend may not jeopardize the large, genetically diverse dolphin population of Shark Bay, the decline is unlikely to be sustainable for local dolphin tourism. A similar decline would be devastating for small, closed, resident, or endangered cetacean populations. The substantial effect of tour vessels on dolphin abundance in a region of low-level tourism calls into question the presumption that dolphin-watching tourism is benign.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, U.S.A. 2: Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4J1, Canada 3: Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7001, Australia 4: Department of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. 20057-1229, U.S.A. 5: Biology Department, University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA 02747, U.S.A. 6: Marine Biology Program, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, Miami, FL 33181, U.S.A. 7: Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Zurich, 8057, Switzerland
Publication date: December 2006