Taxonomic Considerations in Listing Subspecies Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

Authors: HAIG, SUSAN M.; BEEVER, ERIK A.; CHAMBERS, STEVEN M.1; DRAHEIM, HOPE M.; DUGGER, BRUCE D.2; DUNHAM, SUSIE3; ELLIOTT-SMITH, ELISE4; FONTAINE, JOSEPH B.2; KESLER, DYLAN C.; KNAUS, BRIAN J.3; LOPES, IARA F.; LOSCHL, PETE2; MULLINS, THOMAS D.4; SHEFFIELD, LISA M.2

Source: Conservation Biology, Volume 20, Number 6, December 2006 , pp. 1584-1594(11)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Abstract: 

The U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) allows listing of subspecies and other groupings below the rank of species. This provides the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service with a means to target the most critical unit in need of conservation. Although roughly one-quarter of listed taxa are subspecies, these management agencies are hindered by uncertainties about taxonomic standards during listing or delisting activities. In a review of taxonomic publications and societies, we found few subspecies lists and none that stated standardized criteria for determining subspecific taxa. Lack of criteria is attributed to a centuries-old debate over species and subspecies concepts. Nevertheless, the critical need to resolve this debate for ESA listings led us to propose that minimal biological criteria to define disjunct subspecies (legally or taxonomically) should include the discreteness and significance criteria of distinct population segments (as defined under the ESA). Our subspecies criteria are in stark contrast to that proposed by supporters of the phylogenetic species concept and provide a clear distinction between species and subspecies. Efforts to eliminate or reduce ambiguity associated with subspecies-level classifications will assist with ESA listing decisions. Thus, we urge professional taxonomic societies to publish and periodically update peer-reviewed species and subspecies lists. This effort must be paralleled throughout the world for efficient taxonomic conservation to take place.

Keywords: IUCN Red List; Lista Roja IUCN; distinct population segment; evolutionarily significant unit; nomenclatura; nomenclature; segmento distinto de la población; taxonomy; taxonomía; unidad evolutiva significativa

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00530.x

Affiliations: 1: Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, NM 87103, U.S.A. 2: Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. 3: Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A. 4: USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, U.S.A.

Publication date: December 1, 2006

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page