Treatment of rosacea with intense pulsed light: significant improvement and long-lasting results

Authors: Papageorgiou, P.; Clayton, W.; Norwood, S.1; Chopra, S.2; Rustin, M.

Source: British Journal of Dermatology, Volume 159, Number 3, September 2008 , pp. 628-632(5)

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Summary Background 

Rosacea is a common skin condition but the treatments currently available are not satisfactory. Objectives 

To assess the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) for treatment of stage I rosacea (flushing, erythema and telangiectasia). Methods 

Thirty-four patients were treated, 25 women and nine men, mean age 47 years. The treatment employed was IPL 515-1200 nm, with a 560 nm cut-off filter. The fluence range was 24-32 J cm−2. Four treatments were administered on the face at 3-week intervals. Erythema values were measured at baseline and at the end of the treatment period on the cheeks and chin. Digital photographs were assessed by a consultant dermatologist on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients' assessments were also made using a 10-point VAS. Outcome measures were repeated 6 months after treatment. Results 

After four treatments the mean reduction of the erythema values was 39% on the cheeks (P <0·001) and 22% on the chin (P <0·001). This was confirmed by photographic assessment where erythema improved by 46% and telangiectasia by 55% (P <0·001). The severity of rosacea was reduced on average by 3·5 points on the 10-point VAS. Patients' and physicians' assessments of the overall improvement of rosacea were similar: more than 50% improvement was noticed in 73% and 83% of patients, respectively (P <0·001). The results were sustained at 6 months. Side-effects were minimal and self-limiting. Conclusions 

IPL significantly reduces erythema and telangiectasia of rosacea and this is sustained for at least 6 months.

Keywords: intense pulsed light; rosacea; telangiectasia; treatment

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08702.x

Affiliations: 1: Department of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, London, U.K. 2: Department of Dermatology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, U.K.

Publication date: 2008-09-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page