Self-Rated “No-” and “Low-” Risk Pregnancy: A Comparison of Outcomes for Women in Obstetric-Led and Midwife-Led Units in England

$48.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Download / Buy Article:

Abstract:

ABSTRACT: 

Background: Debate in the United Kingdom about place of birth often concerns obstetric-led units and midwife-led units and relates to notions of risk and safety. Outcomes for these two types of unit are often not comparable because of the restricted selection criteria for midwife-led units. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for women intending to give birth in these different types of unit and whose self-rated pregnancy risk level was “none” or “low.” Methods: Self-completion questionnaires were distributed to mothers 8 days after the birth in 9 units (6 midwife led 3 obstetric led) over a 6-month period.Results: Completed questionnaires were received from 432 women (midwife led = 294, obstetric led = 138). Mothers in midwife-led units spent shorter times in labor in the unit (p < 0.01), received less analgesia (p < 0.01) and had fewer interventions (p < 0.01), and were more likely to have a normal delivery (p < 0.01) than women in obstetric-led units. Similar differences were found for both primiparous and multiparous women. In terms of the number of midwives attending each woman, analysis of covariance suggested different models of care depending on type of unit (p < 0.05) and parity (p < 0.01).Conclusions: Since these mothers’ self-rated risk level was none or low, some comparability of outcomes is permissible. It appears that models of care are significantly different in obstetric-led units compared with midwife-led units, leading to greater likelihood of intrapartum intervention, need for analgesia, and assisted or operative delivery. A randomized controlled trial examining such units would permit a conclusive examination of these outcomes. (BIRTH 34:4 December 2007)

Keywords: midwife-led unit; model of care; obstetric-led unit; outcomes; risk level

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00191.x

Affiliations: 1: Jeanette Paul is Head of Design, School of Design 2: Maggie Butchart is a Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing & Midwifery 3: Val Carr is a Doctoral Candidate, School of Design, University of Dundee 4: Pat Dugard is an Independent Statistician, Dundee, Scotland.

Publication date: December 1, 2007

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more