Skip to main content

Does Cesarean Section Reduce Postpartum Urinary Incontinence? A Systematic Review

Buy Article:

$51.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ABSTRACT: 

Background: The impact of delivery mode on the development of urinary incontinence has been much debated. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compare the prevalence of postpartum urinary incontinence after cesarean section compared with vaginal birth. Methods: The MEDLINE (1966–2005) and CINAHL (1982–2005) databases were searched for reports specifying postpartum prevalence or incidence of unspecified, stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence by mode of birth. Primary authors were contacted to request unpublished data about severity, parity, and timing of cesarean section. All data were entered into Review Manager software, and odds ratio (OR), absolute risk reduction, and number needed to prevent were calculated. Results: Cesarean section reduced the risk of postpartum stress urinary incontinence from 16 to 9.8 percent (OR = 0.56 [0.45, 0.68], number needed to prevent = 15 [12,22]) in 6 cross-sectional studies, and from 22 to 10 percent in 12 cohort studies (OR=0.48 [0.39, 0.58], number needed to prevent = 10 [8,13]). Differences persisted by parity and after exclusion of instrumental delivery, but risk of severe stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence did not differ by mode of birth. Conclusions: Although short-term occurrence of any degree of postpartum stress urinary incontinence is reduced with cesarean section, severe symptoms are equivalent by mode of birth. Risk of postpartum stress urinary incontinence must be considered in the context of associated maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality. (BIRTH 34:3 September 2007)

Keywords: cesarean section; observational studies; systematic review; urinary incontinence; vaginal birth

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00175.x

Affiliations: 1: Michael C. Klein is a Senior Scientist Emeritus in the Centre for Community Child Health Research, Child and Family Research Institute 2: Janusz Kaczorowski is the Director of Primary Care and Community Research, Child and Family Research Institute 3: Robert M. Liston is a Professor and Head of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 4: Peter von Dadelszen is an Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Publication date: September 1, 2007

bsc/bir/2007/00000034/00000003/art00006
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more