Twinning by reticular pseudo-merohedry in trigonal, tetragonal and hexagonal crystals
Twin laws for trigonal, tetragonal and hexagonal crystals describing twins with principal axes inclined by an angle Φ > 0 are analysed. Twins by reticular merohedry (i.e. obliquity = 0) are possible only for certain values s of the axial ratio c/a. For any other axial ratio r, the laws describe twinning by reticular pseudo-merohedry, i.e. with obliquity > 0. It is shown that (a) tan is a product of two factors, one of which is sinΦ, the other depends only on the relative deviation of r from s; (b) tan≃, where denotes the deformation parameter introduced by Bonnet & Durand [Philos. Mag. (1975), 32, 997–1006]. The angle Φ is listed for all cases of reticular merohedry of trigonal, tetragonal and hexagonal (i.e. optically uniaxial) crystals with twin index Σ≤ 5. Mallard's criterion requires that twin laws by (reticular) pseudo-merohedry have Σ≤ 5 and ≤ 6°. Le Page [J. Appl. Cryst. (2002), 35, 175–181] has written a program determining laws with twin index Σ≤Σmax and obliquity ≤max for any given lattice geometry. Here those solutions are analysed and completed for optically uniaxial crystals. Their lattices are characterized by the Bravais class (tP, tI, hP or hR) and the axial ratio c/a = r. For small max, most solutions are related to (reticular) merohedry for an appropriate value s≃r of the axial ratio. It is argued that other solutions, which are not related to (reticular) merohedry, are not needed to explain observed laws of growth twinning but may be important to interpret observed laws of deformation twinning.
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media